Know Your AI Attack Surface.

Offensive AI security research and red teaming for companies building with LLMs, ML pipelines, and autonomous agents. We find the vulnerabilities before attackers do.

AI Security Intelligence - Built for the AI Era

We combine offensive security research, AI threat intelligence, and risk governance frameworks to help companies understand and reduce their AI attack surface before adversaries find it first.

AI Red Teaming

Systematic adversarial testing of LLMs, AI agents, and ML pipelines. We simulate real attacker techniques - prompt injection, jailbreaking, model inversion, and data exfiltration - before production.

Threat Intelligence

Continuous AI threat intelligence tailored to your stack. Monthly briefings, real-time alerts on emerging AI attack techniques, and quarterly deep-dives on adversarial ML trends.

Risk Frameworks

Design and implement AI risk management frameworks aligned to NIST AI RMF, EU AI Act, and ISO 42001. Governance that satisfies regulators and enterprise procurement teams.

How an infosec.qa Engagement Works

Five phases. AI-augmented attack research. Human-led findings narrative. Results your security and engineering teams can act on immediately.

SCOPE

Scope

Define AI assets in scope - models, APIs, agents, data pipelines. Map trust boundaries and threat actors. Align rules of engagement.

ENUMERATE

Enumerate

AI-assisted attack surface discovery - model endpoints, tool connections, training data sources, third-party integrations, supply chain components.

ATTACK

Attack

Systematic adversarial testing - prompt injection, jailbreaking, model inversion, data poisoning, agent hijacking. AI agents run fuzzing in parallel.

REPORT

Report

Risk-prioritized findings report with business impact, CVSS-AI scores, and NIST AI RMF / EU AI Act compliance mapping. Executive and technical versions.

REMEDIATE

Remediate

Prioritized remediation roadmap. Optional implementation support. Verification re-test included. Ongoing threat intelligence retainer available.

What Our AI Security Research Delivers

150+
AI Systems Assessed
2,400+
Vulnerabilities Reported
NIST
AI RMF Aligned
5.0
Client Satisfaction

"infosec.qa found a critical prompt injection vulnerability in our customer-facing AI assistant that our entire security team had missed. The report was actionable within 24 hours."

- Head of Security, Series B AI Startup

Free AI Security Scorecard

Assess your AI security exposure in 5 minutes. Answer 12 questions about your AI stack and get a personalized risk score with prioritized recommendations.

Take the Free Scorecard

AI Security Intelligence - Frequently Asked Questions

What is AI security intelligence and how is it different from traditional cybersecurity?

AI security intelligence focuses on threats specific to AI systems - prompt injection attacks on LLMs, adversarial inputs that fool ML models, model inversion attacks that extract training data, and AI supply chain risks from third-party models and datasets. Traditional cybersecurity tools and methodologies were not designed for AI-specific attack surfaces. Our practice combines offensive security research with deep AI/ML expertise to address threats that conventional security teams are not equipped to handle.

What does an AI Attack Surface Assessment cover?

Our AI Attack Surface Assessment maps every AI component in your environment - LLM APIs, fine-tuned models, training pipelines, inference infrastructure, agent tool connections, and third-party AI integrations. We identify exposure points, enumerate attack vectors aligned to OWASP LLM Top 10 and MITRE ATLAS, and deliver a prioritized risk register with severity ratings and remediation guidance. Most assessments take 5–10 business days depending on the complexity of your AI stack.

How does AI red teaming differ from conventional penetration testing?

Conventional penetration testing targets web applications, networks, and infrastructure using established tools like Burp Suite and Metasploit. AI red teaming targets the unique properties of AI systems - their non-deterministic behavior, sensitivity to adversarial inputs, susceptibility to prompt injection, and vulnerability to training data extraction. We use specialized AI attack tools including Garak, PyRIT, and custom adversarial testing frameworks. Our researchers understand the underlying ML architecture, not just the API surface.

Which compliance frameworks does your work support?

Our AI risk frameworks and assessments map directly to NIST AI RMF (Govern, Map, Measure, Manage), EU AI Act (risk classification, conformity assessment, ongoing monitoring), ISO 42001 (AI management systems), and SOC 2 (security, availability, confidentiality). For regulated industries, we also align to HIPAA AI guidance, FDA Software as a Medical Device (SaMD) requirements, and FFIEC guidance for financial AI systems. Every deliverable includes a compliance mapping section.

What is AI supply chain security and why does it matter?

AI supply chain security addresses risks introduced by the components you don't build yourself - pre-trained foundation models from Hugging Face or model providers, third-party ML libraries and packages, external training datasets, and AI APIs from vendors like OpenAI, Anthropic, or Cohere. Compromised or manipulated models, backdoored ML packages, and poisoned training data are emerging attack vectors that most security teams are not equipped to assess. Our AI Supply Chain Security Audit evaluates these risks systematically.

Know Your AI Attack Surface

Request a free AI Security Scorecard assessment and discover your AI exposure in 5 minutes.

Get Your Free Scorecard